The predictability of systems’ responses to forcing has important policy implications: systems that have high predictability enable policy decisions to be made with more confidence, because the outcomes of those decisions are more assured (see Sarewitz et al., 2000). Conversely, policy decisions are difficult to make or subject to greater future uncertainty where PDFs of systems’ responses are polymodal or span a wide range of possible outcomes. This is a challenge for the future monitoring and management of all Earth systems in the Anthropocene. Although in the this website past the ‘strong’ Principle of Uniformitarianism has been critically
discussed with respect to present theories and practices of scientific research in geography and geology, its criticisms have focused more on the research approach rather than the research object. Here, we argue that the research object – Earth’s physical systems – cannot be meaningfully investigated using a ‘weak’ uniformitarian approach, because the unique nature of the Anthropocene has moved these Earth systems away from the process dynamics and controls expected of a typical interglacial. Instead, we argue
that the Anthropocene poses a challenge for post-normal science, in which nonlinear systems’ feedbacks are increasingly more important (and systems are thus less predictable as a result). As such, traditional systems’ properties such as equilibrium and equifinality are increasingly irrelevant, and Earth systems in the BAY 73-4506 Anthropocene are unlikely to attain a characteristic state that will permit their easy monitoring, modelling and management. Thus, although ‘the present is [not] THE key to the past’, it may be ‘A key’. We thank Vic Baker and two other anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper, and associate editor Jon Harbor for suggestions. “
“No metaphysical notion is more commonly and uncritically presumed to be fundamental to the Earth sciences, and to geology in particular,
than that of uniformitarianism. Given that this regulative principle privileges knowledge about the present in regard to inferences about the past, it is ironic FER that its introduction in the late 18th and early 19th centuries coincided approximately with the time when the Industrial Revolution was initiating a great acceleration in carbon dioxide emissions and when human population growth was greatly increasing many geomorphological process activities on portions of Earth’s surface. These are changes that are most commonly proposed to mark the beginning of the Anthropocene, though some human-induced environmental changes were very important even earlier in Earth history (Foley et al., 2013).