Recently, resources to increase Australian OTD rates have
been aimed at emergency departments (ED) as a significant missed donor potential was discovered. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess Australian ED clinicians’ acceptance and knowledge regarding BD. Most (86%) of the 599 medical and 212 nursing staff accepted BD, but only 60% passed a 5-item-validated BD knowledge tool. BD knowledge was related to the acceptance of BD. Accepting BD influenced attitudes toward OTD, including willingness to donate. BD acceptance and knowledge were related to education/training regarding OTD, years of experience in EDs, experience with OTD-related tasks, and increased perceived competence and comfort Kinase Inhibitor Library concentration with OTD-related tasks. Of concern, more than half of respondents who did not pass the BD test reported feeling competent and comfortable explaining BD to next of kin; of respondents who had recent experience with this, more than a third failed the BD test. Despite
being generally positive toward OTD, Australian ED clinicians do not have a sound knowledge of BD. This may be hampering efforts to increase donation rates from the ED.”
“PURPOSE: To compare 2 new optical biometry devices with the present gold standard biometer.
SETTING: Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.
METHODS: In patients scheduled Selleck P5091 for cataract surgery, measurements performed with the current gold standard optical biometer (IOLMaster) were compared with those of 2 new optical biometers, the Lenstar LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry [OLCR] device; substudy 1) and the IOLMaster 500 (partial coherence interferometry [PCI] device; Autophagy 抑制剂 substudy 2). The duration of patient data entry and of 1:he actual measurement process and the time from intraocular lens power calculation to printout were calculated.
RESULTS:
The mean difference in axial length measurements was 0.01 mm +/- 0.05 (SD) between the gold standard device and the new OLCR device and 0.01 +/- 0.02 mm between the gold standard device and the new PCI device (P = .12 and P < .001, respectively). Measurements with the new OLCR device took significantly longer than with the gold standard device (mean difference 209 +/- 127 seconds), and measurements with the gold standard device took significantly longer than with the new PCI device (mean difference 82 +/- 46 seconds) (both P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: All 3 devices were easy to use for biometry before cataract surgery. Measurements with the new PCI device took half as long as those with the gold standard device. Measurements with the new OLCR device took twice as long as those with the gold standard device.