We believe that a consistent fraction of the small G1 HCC cases of the present series likely belong to this so-called very early type. The phenotypic profile of these cases is clearly distinct from that of other HCCs of the present series, and this provides indirect proof of an earlier disease. Indeed, the small G1 HCCs were less likely to be stained with the combination of the panel markers, their profile being intermediate between dysplasia (usually not staining) and

HCC that has progressed (mostly staining). It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that when an HCC is just born, its phenotypic profile is not yet settled (e.g., the vascular support), and these markers Small molecule library cost are individually and progressively acquired and detectable. In our cases, the most represented marker in small G1 HCCs was CHC (58.8%), which was followed by GS (41.2%), HSP70 (17.6%), and GPC3 (11.8%). This means that see more in small G1 HCCs, CHC is the most overexpressed marker. Thus, its evaluation, particularly in tumor core biopsy samples, is important, needs attention, and requires preliminary individual training. In particular, as for all the other markers under study, its staining should decorate

putative malignant hepatocytes, and it should appear as antigen overexpression in comparison with surrounding, adjacent nonneoplastic parenchymal cells. We believe that the prospective evaluation of nodules that remain diagnostically uncertain after biopsy could be very valuable for assessing the diagnostic

strength of the present panel. Clearly, the search for additional and early markers has just started and is far less than completed. In conclusion, we have shown that in core biopsy specimens of HCCs sampled with a 20-to 21-gauge needle, the addition of CHC to a panel composed of GPC3, HSP70, and GS increases the overall diagnostic accuracy in both small HCCs (from 76.9% to 84.3%) and nonsmall HCCs (from 86% to 97%), and there is an important gain in sensitivity in the detection of small HCCs (from 46.8% to 63.8%). Absolute specificity was obtained only when two of the four markers were positive (regardless of which ones). Accuracy for HCC detection was not affected by the tumor size in G2/G3 HCCs (>90%). In G1 HCCs, tumor size played a major role in discriminating cases, with higher accuracy for nonsmall HCCs (93.9%) and lower accuracy for small HCCs (67.4%); medchemexpress likewise, the sensitivity was 88.2% for nonsmall HCCs and 50% for small HCCs. Our results suggest that small G1 HCCs include early tumors characterized by a relatively silent phenotype and the progressive acquisition of the markers under study. The use of the present panel of markers supports the recognition of both small and nonsmall HCCs in the diagnostic pathology of challenging cases sampled by core biopsy. The authors acknowledge the statistical expertise of Luca Zamataro, M.D., and the contributions of Tatiana Brambilla, M.D., and Bethania Fernandes, M.D.