twice as high than for the clear-cut plots (Fig. 3). Fig. 3 The expected cumulative number of scuttle fly species as a function of number of sampled individuals in four habitat types. Estimated species richness, corrected for species unseen in samples, is given in the box. Data from BF, TF and Talazoparib BPF are pooled (unpublished material) Of the two post-windstorm habitats in PF, the left-windthrow habitat was more diverse (diversity expressed as the cumulative number of fly species) than the logged-windthrow one. Among twenty-two species, common to both post-windstorm habitats, almost all (S = 20) reached a higher
abundance in left- windthrow plots (Table 1). However, the total species richness, corrected for unseen species, was higher in the logged-windthrow relative to the left- windthrow habitats. (Table 1; Fig. 3). Scuttle fly trophic structure in disturbed and intact habitats The abundance (N) of the species with saprophagous, polysaprophagous and necrophagous larvae (all as saprophagous group: S = 36) was distinctly higher (N = 82–87 %) in the scuttle fly communities
inhabiting disturbed plots, than the communities of the old-growth (N = 53.2 %) habitats. The abundance HDAC inhibitor of six mycophagous species, inhabiting clear-cuts (N = 8.9 %) and four species of logged-windthrow (N = 7.8 %) plots, was significantly higher compared to the mycophagous species of old-growths (N = 3.5 %) and left-windthrow (5.3 %) areas. In contrast, the species with zoophagous Thymidylate synthase larvae reached the highest abundance in the left-windthrow (N = 9.6 %) and old-growths (N = 5.6 %) habitats. The reaction, expressed as Chi square values computed for the species with known biology, showed a significant and positive correlation between the forests (χ 2 = 1940.8, df = 15, P < 0.0001) (Table 1; Fig. 4). Fig. 4 Contribution to the scuttle fly communities of species with different larval diet, in the four habitat types. 1 Saprophagous larvae; 2 mycophagous larvae; 3 polyphagous larvae; 4 zoophagous larvae (unpublished
material) Body size and preferences for different habitats Habitat preferences of the scuttle flies were found to be significantly correlated to their body size (Tukey’ test: P < 0.05). Smaller species (mean length ≤ 1.35 mm) preferred disturbed habitats, whereas larger species preferred intact forests. In the case of both post-windstorm areas, the mean body length of the scuttle fly species was almost identical (Fig. 5). Fig. 5 Mean body length and its standard error of the scuttle fly species in different habitats; Different letters denote statistically significant differences (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05) (unpublished material) Discussion The study has one important flaw: the sampling in Pisz Forest and the remaining forests was conducted during different periods.