“
“Purpose of review Osteoporosis treatments will be used with increasing frequency as the population ages; however, relatively little
is known about their long-term safety. Recent case reports cite a range of potential adverse events. We review data regarding atrial fibrillation, bone pain, osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical fractures, and osteosarcoma.
Recent findings Incidence of bisphosphonate-related ONJ in osteoporosis patients is unclear, but several studies suggest rates may be higher than one in 100 000. Severe bone pain and esophageal cancer have been described among bisphosphonate users, but their relationship has not been carefully studied. The relationship between atrial fibrillation and bisphosphonates
is unclear based on existing GW-572016 purchase data, but the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) analyses suggest no clear association. Although several case series discuss atypical fractures associated with bisphosphonate use, one epidemiologic study found no association. Finally, one case of osteosarcoma has been reported in a woman using teriparatide. One case in over 200 000 users suggests no increase in risk beyond background risk, but further evaluation is necessary.
Summary Although case reports of adverse events with osteoporosis medications suggest potential links, epidemiological analyses have largely failed to illuminate AZD6094 concentration Selleck KU 57788 a strong, clear link between osteoporosis therapies and many adverse events, with ONJ an exception. Until further data are available, providers should be aware of these potential side effects, and inform their patients accordingly.”
“To investigate the effect of treatment of multiple myeloma (MM)-associated spinal fracture with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and chemotherapy.
Patients with MM-associated spinal fracture were randomly divided into combined (PVP and chemotherapy) treatment group (n = 38) and single chemotherapy group (n = 38). For the combined treatment group, bone cement was injected into vertebral body via DSA guided-percutaneous
puncture. M2 scheme was used for both groups. And a 5-year follow-up was conducted for the study.
At the 1-year follow-up visits, PVP combined with chemotherapy achieved complete remission (CR) in six patients (15.8%); near complete remission (nCR) in ten patients (26.30%); partial remission (PR) in nine patients (23.7%); minimal response (MR) in three patients (7.9%); no change (NC) in four patients (10.5%), and disease progression (DP) in five patients (13.2%). Only chemotherapy alone resulted in 3 CR (7.9%); 8 nCR (26.30%); 19 PR (77.5%); 4 MR (17.5%); 4 NC (17.5%), and 2 DP (5.0%). While the overall response rate (ORR) in the combined treatment group (65.8%) and the single chemotherapy group (50.0%) were significantly different, their visual analog pain scales (3.01 +/- A 0.62 and 5.97 +/- A 0.