Instead, a combination of environmentally and genetically transmitted noncognitive
(‘noncognitive’ because inherited IQ was shown not to explain social class inheritance) personality traits have been proposed to account for most of the correlation between the economic positions of parents and children [50]. Although more work is needed to selleck chemicals llc unveil the contribution of specific personality traits, a recent study that applied mathematical modeling to results from a classic twin design study [51] suggested that one of the key characteristics to attain high social status, ‘being attractive to others’, is heritable and plays a role in the evolution of social networks. Apart from aggressive behavior and dominance-motivation, the energy or ‘vigor’ to perform in a social competition is yet another feature that relates to social dominance [42•]. There is evidence that this type of energy may be genetically controlled. Both in bees and
in the fruit fly, the tendency to forage is controlled by a gene called for (for foraging). High levels of for-activity results in animals exhibiting a more energetic phenotype as compared Fluorouracil datasheet to their lower for-activity level counterparts [43]. In bees, the activity level of for not only controls how vigorous the animal seeks for food but also determines its social status in the hive [44]. Differences in social rank have also been linked to differences in resting metabolism in some populations of fish, bird and rodent Amino acid species [45]. The identification of genes that contribute to the determination of social dominance rank has just started. In fact, no gene that exclusively
promotes social dominance has so far being identified. Possibly, the genetic contribution to a social hierarchy formation is routed via behavioral dimensions that contribute to its expression indirectly. The behavioral dimensions involved may include individual differences in personality affecting trait anxiety, agonistic behavior, motivational processes and/or behavioral vigor. Susceptibility to the context might also be a critical dimension, as stress was shown to strongly influence social hierarchy formation 46 and 47]. Although the mechanisms are largely unknown, it is plausible that genes encoding for components of the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems, as well as the social neuropeptides, underlie –at least partly- rank-formation in a social hierarchy. In addition, transcriptional regulators and imprinted genes hold great promise for the future investigation on the underpinnings of social hierarchy formation behavior. The functional modulation of the specific genes by epigenetic factors in turn may link the genetic and environmental factors involved in the establishment of a social hierarchy.