Due to technological advances and declines in cost, telemedicine for trauma and surgical care is becoming increasingly a viable option to address these current challenges and demands. Telemedicine is generally thought of as the utilization of telecommunications and information Dorsomorphin supplier technologies in

providing health care at a distance. Not a novel concept, examples can be dated back to the 1960s when the first surgical case was broadcasted overseas through videoconferencing for educational purposes [4]. Today, telemedicine can facilitate the mentoring of less experienced surgeons remotely, known as telementoring, as well as transfer information between clinicians for consultation purposes. Teleconsultation can be particularly useful for physicians needing to obtain a second opinion from remote medical specialists. Access to remote

Selleckchem 3 MA specialists may also help in patient transfer decision-making, helping distant hospitals treat patients locally when possible by bringing the specialist to the patient. This potentially can improve patient outcomes and safety; while reducing the need for costly, unnecessary transfers. Although promising, Avapritinib order before implementing new technologies it is crucial that the chosen system be appropriately evaluated. For the past two years, the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine has been testing different mobile telemedicine solutions in the operating room of a large, urban level 1 trauma center. The Ryder Trauma Center at Jackson Memorial Hospital is the only level 1 trauma center serving all residents of Miami-Dade County. The primary objective of this study is to ascertain the usability and feasibility of a

remote presence robot for use in the operating room during real surgical cases. The goal is to determine the strengths and weaknesses to Ketotifen its implementation for future telementoring and consultation purposes. Materials and methods Study design We collected prospective, observational data regarding the usability of a telepresence robot in the operating room (Figure 1). Data was collected on 50 surgical cases over a 4 month period from December 2010 to March 2011. We included both trauma and non-trauma surgical cases. Once notified of a case, the robot was wheeled into the operating room by a member of the research team. From a remote location in the hospital – an office on the second floor- the remote physician connected to the robot to see the activities in the operating room and communicate with local clinicians. From the remote location the physician can control the camera (pan, tilt and zoom) to get the best angle of the procedure. At the end of the surgical procedure, both the remote and local physicians are surveyed on their perceptions of using the telepresence robot. Figure 1 The VisitOR1™ adjustable height gives the remote specialist a view of the surgical field, allowing for consultation and interactive mentoring in real-time with the local on-site surgeons.