and Coudeville is that ours assumes that people can only undergo natural infection by up to two dengue serotypes while they assume that up to four infections are possible. Our assumption is supported by the low frequency of tertiary and quaternary infections among hospital cohorts [8] and [19] and by the broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody response that is maintained after secondary infection. However, whether tertiary and quaternary play some role in the transmission dynamics

of dengue is still under debate. Relaxing this assumption would remove the competition between serotypes imposed by www.selleckchem.com/p38-MAPK.html our model, and in general lead to greater reductions in cumulative incidence with the use of partially effective vaccines. Our model makes the assumption that the probability

of developing clinically apparent disease is higher in the presence of pre-existing immunity, regardless of whether this immunity is the result of natural infection or vaccination. A similar assumption is made in the model selleckchem by Coudeville [22]. While in the context of natural infections it is well established that pre-existing immunity against a heterologous serotype is the main risk-factor for the development of severe disease [7], immunopathogenic effects of vaccine-induced immunity are yet to be elucidated. If heterologous vaccine induced immunity protects against infection or clinically apparent disease, the impact of partially effective vaccines will be greater than that estimated by our model. While we calibrated our transmission Oxymatrine parameters to fit the age distribution of seroprevalence and reported cases in Rayong, Thailand, current knowledge of dengue epidemiology can distinguish between

many of the scenarios that we simulated. Multiple studies have found evidence of heterogeneity [14], [31] and [32] but the extent to which heterogeneity in clinical expression, transmissibility or enhancement exists is not known. One of the main objectives of this research was to identify scenarios that could potentially result in adverse population effects after mass vaccination with partially effective vaccines, and therefore we deliberately chose to explore a wide parameter space, even if this resulted in unrealistic dynamics in some cases. There are important gaps in our understanding of serotype dynamics, cross-protection [33], enhancement and pathogenicity [34], [35] and [36]. Our results aim to represent hyperendemic areas generally, but predicting the potential impact of vaccination in any specific setting would require extensive serotype-specific longitudinal data that is only available from cohort studies. While our sensitivity analyses suggest that partially effective vaccines have the potential to be even more useful in settings with stable low transmission, better understanding of the changing epidemiology of dengue in settings of more recent re-emergence (e.g.