, 2010, Ridderinkhof et al., 2005 and White et al., 2011), the reversed ordering has consistently been observed in the standard version of the Simon task ( Burle et al., 2002, Pratte et al., 2010, Ridderinkhof, 2002 and Schwarz and Miller, 2012). That is, the incompatible condition is
associated with the largest mean and the smallest SD, which violates Wagenmakers–Brown’s law. This singularity led researchers to propose that the Simon check details effect may be incompatible with the diffusion framework ( Pratte et al., 2010 and Schwarz and Miller, 2012). Given the success of time-dependent diffusion processes in modeling the Eriksen task, such an assumption would mean that decision-making draws upon qualitatively different mechanisms depending on the nature of the conflicting situation. As introduced above, Piéron and Wagenmakers–Brown laws are hallmarks of a standard DDM with constant drift rate. In their studies, learn more neither Hübner
et al. nor White et al. (Hübner and Töbel, 2012, Hübner et al., 2010, White et al., 2011 and White et al., 2011) explored properties of their model when the perceptual intensity of the relevant stimulus attribute is manipulated. Simulations of the SSP and DSTP, presented in Section 2, aimed to determine whether Piéron and Wagenmakers–Brown laws still hold under the assumption of time-varying decision evidence. To our knowledge, the two laws have never been concurrently investigated in conflict tasks. An exception is found in a recent study by Stafford et al. (2011). Those researchers manipulated the intensity of colors in a standard Atorvastatin Stroop task. Five suprathreshold color saturation levels were presented in an intermixed fashion. In each compatibility condition, mean RT and color discriminability scaled according to Piéron’s law. Interestingly, the two factors combined in an additive fashion. Results remained similar when the word and the color were spatially separated (i.e., separate Stroop task). Section 3 extends those findings by providing an empirical test of Piéron and Wagenmakers–Brown
laws in Eriksen and Simon tasks. The Eriksen task was naturally chosen insofar as the DSTP and SSP models have specifically been tested on it. The Simon task was also introduced because we could anticipate a violation of Wagenmakers–Brown’s law. To allow a direct comparison between the two experiments, we used the standard Simon task and a version of the Eriksen task in which subjects have to discriminate the color of a central circle while ignoring the color of flanking circles (Davranche, Hall, & McMorris, 2009). The perceptual intensity of the target could thus be varied along the same color saturation dimension. Color saturation was manipulated within a highly controlled perceptual color space while keeping constant any other aspect of the display.