It is well known that the bandgap E g and the absorption coefficient α are related as in the following equation: (2) selleck screening library where α, v, E g, and A are the absorption coefficient, light frequency, bandgap, and a constant, respectively. If the compound scatters

in a perfectly diffuse manner, K becomes equal to 2α. In this case, we can use the following expression: (3) Therefore, the bandgap energy (E g) of the resulting samples can be estimated from a plot of [F(R)hν]2 versus photon energy (hν). The [F(R)hν]2 versus hν graph of CdSe, CdSe-TiO2, TiO2, and CdSe-C60/TiO2 are presented in Figure 7. The intercept of the tangent to the x-axis would give a good approximation of the bandgap energy of the samples. The bandgap of CdSe is evaluated to be 1.81 eV, which is fairly close to the literature value Go6983 cost of 1.74 eV [26, 27]. It is also found that the bandgap of CdSe-TiO2

is 1.95 eV, which is greater than the standard bandgap (1.78 eV for CdSe), showing a blueshift of 0.14 eV. The bandgap of CdSe-C60/TiO2 is about 1.77 eV, showing a blueshift of 0.05 eV. Figure 7 Variation of ( α hν) 2 versus photon energy (hν) for CdSe, CdSe-TiO 2 , TiO 2 , and CdSe-C 60 /TiO 2 . Figure 8 shows the time series of dye degradation using CdSe, CdSe-TiO2, and CdSe-C60/TiO2 under visible-light irradiation. The spectra for the dye solution after visible-light irradiation show the relative degradation yields at see more different irradiation times. The decrease in dye concentration continued with an oppositely gentle slope, which was due to visible-light irradiation. The concentration

of dyes was 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L, and the absorbance for dye PAK5 decreased with the visible-light irradiation time. Moreover, the dye solution increasingly lost its color, and the dye concentration decreased. Two steps are involved in the photocatalytic decomposition of dyes: the adsorption of dye molecules and degradation. After adsorption in the dark for 30 min, the samples reached adsorption-desorption equilibrium. In the adsorptive step, CdSe, CdSe-TiO2, and CdSe-C60/TiO2 composites showed different adsorptive effects with CdSe-C60/TiO2 having the best adsorptive effect. The adsorptive effect of pure CdSe was the lowest. The adsorptive effect of CdSe-C60/TiO2 was better than that of CdSe-TiO2 because the added C60 can enhance the BET surface area which can increase the adsorption effect. CdSe-C60/TiO2 has the largest BET surface area, which can enhance the adsorptive effect. In the degradation step, the CdSe, CdSe-TiO2, and CdSe-C60/TiO2 composites showed a good degradation effect, as shown in the UV–vis absorption spectra. The CdSe-C60/TiO2 composites showed good adsorption and degradation effects.