With the development of cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) specific inhibitors, safe anti-inflammatory agents were claimed to be available for patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease to prevent complications. While COX-2 inhibitors might
be safe for average risk patients, a randomized study showed that in patients who had a history of peptic ulcer bleeding, celecoxib usage led to recurrent bleeding in 4.9% and conventional NSAID B-Raf inhibitor drug (diclofenac) combined with proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole) in 6.4% in a period of 6 months.30 These are not negligible risks of recurrent bleeding and therefore a more safe approach needs to be sorted. We tested the combination of COX-2 inhibitor with proton pump inhibitor and compared against COX-2 inhibitor alone in a group of high-risk patients who required an anti-inflammatory agent for arthritis.31 In a study enrolling 441 patients, the combination of COX-2 inhibitor and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was found to be associated with significantly fewer re-bleeding episodes than COX-2 inhibitor alone (0% vs 8.9%). This finding should encourage the recommendation of combination therapy in very high risk patients who require anti-inflammatory www.selleckchem.com/products/Romidepsin-FK228.html therapy. However, the increased cardiovascular risk in long-term use of COX-2 inhibitors should lead to caution against its usage in patients with coronary heart disease. A balance between the gastrointestinal risk and cardiovascular risk should be evaluated in patients
who require long-term anti-inflammatory therapy. Table 1 is a suggested permutation for clinicians’ reference. Aspirin is well known to have ulcerogenic effects and the magnitude of GI toxicity is comparable to conventional NSAIDs. However, with the increasing incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease worldwide, the consumption of aspirin and other anti-platelet agents is ever increasing. Unlike conventional NSAIDs, before prescribing low-dose aspirin to patients with history of peptic ulcer disease, eradication of H. pylori infection confers significant
protection against peptic ulcer and ulcer complications. In a randomized study comparing anti-Helicobacter therapy against proton pump inhibitors in patients with a history of Adenosine peptic ulcer bleeding, the two strategies had comparable clinical outcomes over 6 months.29 This is a distinctly different phenomenon compared with conventional NSAIDs (see above). Therefore, checking for H. pylori infection and treating when testing positive for this infection is very important among aspirin users. In recent years, clopidogrel and other anti-platelet agents have been developed to provide safer drugs for GI protection. Clopidogrel, being the prototype of these agents, has been widely used either singularly or in combination with aspirin in patients with coronary heart disease and stroke. When used in high-risk patients, however, clopidogrel is not as safe as claimed to be in the gastrointestinal tract.