For the pharmacist it was more about ensuring they received feedback to help them know where the patient was at, or assist in addressing an issue. Face-to-face communication was seen RAD001 chemical structure as a way of ensuring this. For example ‘. . . maybe a written, a short note from the doctor.’ (pharmacist

11), ‘. . . if you’re not getting answers [over the phone] here you can actually go in [to their surgery] . . .’ (pharmacist 11). Others also mentioned financial remuneration. Despite all challenges, GPs and pharmacists felt that a collaborative approach delivered benefits to HCPs and patients. Both GPs and pharmacists felt that patients would benefit with improved asthma control, improved quality of life and reduced morbidity and mortality. For example: ‘. . . the patients . . . are receiving more and more frequent information, that their asthma is better controlled, that they’re getting the same information from multiple sources . . .’ (GP1), ‘. . . the whole concept of . . . better health . . . if we work together as a team the knowledge would get out there a lot quicker . . .’ (pharmacist 7), ‘. . . there would be far less hospital visits . . .’ (pharmacist 11), ‘better control of their asthma, better quality of life. They (the patient) would also buy CHIR-99021 have

increased access to HCPs or perceived increased access to HCPs, it would also improve their relationship with the doctor and the pharmacist. . . . It might reduce mortality and that is a most desired outcome.’ (pharmacist

18). Both professional groups believed that pharmacists would benefit with increased knowledge, increased patient rapport, increased professional fulfillment and improved professional image. When it came to benefits to the GP, pharmacists were more likely to see benefits for the GPs, while GPs thought the benefits were greater for the pharmacists, and they had less to gain. Benefits for GPs were perceived to be time savings and pharmacists believed that GPs would benefit with improved patient care delivery, professional relationships and respect from the patient. For example ‘. . . the advantage is that for the GP we don’t have to spend as much time on this sort of topic . . . it’s been drummed into them by the nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists, Amino acid as well as GPs’ (GP1), ‘it would help the doctor too, because it would increase respect from the patient. Some patients say “oh the doctor just writes you a script”, some patients have got the feeling that the doctor doesn’t care anymore . . . if we can help the patient . . . more respect for the pharmacist and the doctor. . . .’ (pharmacist 13). In this study we aimed to investigate the relationships between GPs and pharmacists in the primary care of asthma, in an attempt to further understand the fundamentals associated with these relationships and to identify a process by which these relationships could be further developed.